1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
|
/*
* Copyright (c) 2018-2020, Andreas Kling <kling@serenityos.org>
* Copyright (c) 2021, Max Wipfli <mail@maxwipfli.ch>
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
*/
#include <AK/RefPtr.h>
#include <AK/StringView.h>
#include <Kernel/API/Unveil.h>
#include <Kernel/FileSystem/Custody.h>
#include <Kernel/FileSystem/VirtualFileSystem.h>
#include <Kernel/Library/KLexicalPath.h>
#include <Kernel/Tasks/Process.h>
namespace Kernel {
static void update_intermediate_node_permissions(UnveilNode& root_node, UnveilAccess new_permissions)
{
for (auto& entry : root_node.children()) {
auto& node = static_cast<UnveilNode&>(*entry.value);
if (node.was_explicitly_unveiled())
continue;
node.metadata_value().permissions = new_permissions;
update_intermediate_node_permissions(node, new_permissions);
}
}
static ErrorOr<void> update_unveil_data(Process::UnveilData& locked_unveil_data, StringView unveiled_path, UnveilAccess new_permissions)
{
auto path_parts = KLexicalPath::parts(unveiled_path);
auto it = path_parts.begin();
// Note: For the sake of completence, we check if the locked state was inherited
// by an execve'd sequence. If that is the case, just silently ignore this.
if (locked_unveil_data.state == VeilState::LockedInherited)
return {};
// NOTE: We have to check again, since the veil may have been locked by another thread
// while we were parsing the arguments.
if (locked_unveil_data.state == VeilState::Locked)
return EPERM;
auto& matching_node = locked_unveil_data.paths.traverse_until_last_accessible_node(it, path_parts.end());
if (it.is_end()) {
// If the path has already been explicitly unveiled, do not allow elevating its permissions.
if (matching_node.was_explicitly_unveiled()) {
if (new_permissions & ~matching_node.permissions())
return EPERM;
}
// It is possible that nodes that are "grandchildren" of the matching node have already been unveiled.
// This means that there may be intermediate nodes between this one and the unveiled "grandchildren"
// that inherited the current node's previous permissions. Those nodes now need their permissions
// updated to match the current node.
if (matching_node.permissions() != new_permissions)
update_intermediate_node_permissions(matching_node, new_permissions);
matching_node.metadata_value().explicitly_unveiled = true;
matching_node.metadata_value().permissions = new_permissions;
locked_unveil_data.state = VeilState::Dropped;
return {};
}
auto new_unveiled_path = TRY(KString::try_create(unveiled_path));
TRY(matching_node.insert(
it,
path_parts.end(),
{ move(new_unveiled_path), new_permissions, true },
[](auto& parent, auto& it) -> ErrorOr<Optional<UnveilMetadata>> {
auto path = TRY(KString::formatted("{}/{}", parent.path(), *it));
return UnveilMetadata(move(path), parent.permissions(), false);
}));
VERIFY(locked_unveil_data.state != VeilState::Locked);
locked_unveil_data.state = VeilState::Dropped;
return {};
}
ErrorOr<FlatPtr> Process::sys$unveil(Userspace<Syscall::SC_unveil_params const*> user_params)
{
VERIFY_NO_PROCESS_BIG_LOCK(this);
auto params = TRY(copy_typed_from_user(user_params));
if (!params.path.characters && !params.permissions.characters) {
m_unveil_data.with([&](auto& unveil_data) { unveil_data.state = VeilState::Locked; });
return 0;
}
if (!((params.flags & to_underlying(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) || (params.flags & to_underlying(UnveilFlags::AfterExec))))
return EINVAL;
// Note: If we inherited a locked state, then silently ignore the unveil request,
// and let the user program potentially deal with an ENOENT error later on.
if ((params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) && veil_state() == VeilState::LockedInherited)
return 0;
// Note: We only lock the unveil state for current program, while allowing adding
// indefinitely unveil data before doing the actual exec().
if ((params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) && veil_state() == VeilState::Locked)
return EPERM;
if (!params.path.characters || !params.permissions.characters)
return EINVAL;
if (params.permissions.length > 5)
return EINVAL;
auto path = TRY(get_syscall_path_argument(params.path));
if (path->is_empty() || !path->view().starts_with('/'))
return EINVAL;
auto permissions = TRY(try_copy_kstring_from_user(params.permissions));
// Let's work out permissions first...
unsigned new_permissions = 0;
for (char const permission : permissions->view()) {
switch (permission) {
case 'r':
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Read;
break;
case 'w':
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Write;
break;
case 'x':
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Execute;
break;
case 'c':
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::CreateOrRemove;
break;
case 'b':
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Browse;
break;
default:
return EINVAL;
}
}
// Now, let's try and resolve the path and obtain custody of the inode on the disk, and if not, bail out with
// the error from resolve_path_without_veil()
// However, if the user specified unveil() with "c" permissions, we don't set errno if ENOENT is encountered,
// because they most likely intend the program to create the file for them later on.
// If this case is encountered, the parent node of the path is returned and the custody of that inode is used instead.
RefPtr<Custody> parent_custody; // Parent inode in case of ENOENT
OwnPtr<KString> new_unveiled_path;
auto custody_or_error = VirtualFileSystem::the().resolve_path_without_veil(credentials(), path->view(), VirtualFileSystem::the().root_custody(), &parent_custody);
if (!custody_or_error.is_error()) {
new_unveiled_path = TRY(custody_or_error.value()->try_serialize_absolute_path());
} else if (custody_or_error.error().code() == ENOENT && parent_custody && (new_permissions & UnveilAccess::CreateOrRemove)) {
auto parent_custody_path = TRY(parent_custody->try_serialize_absolute_path());
new_unveiled_path = TRY(KLexicalPath::try_join(parent_custody_path->view(), KLexicalPath::basename(path->view())));
} else {
// FIXME Should this be EINVAL?
return custody_or_error.release_error();
}
if (params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) {
TRY(unveil_data().with([&](auto& data) -> ErrorOr<void> {
TRY(update_unveil_data(data, new_unveiled_path->view(), static_cast<UnveilAccess>(new_permissions)));
return {};
}));
}
if (params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::AfterExec)) {
TRY(exec_unveil_data().with([&](auto& data) -> ErrorOr<void> {
// Note: The only valid way to get into this state is by using unveil before doing
// an actual exec with the UnveilFlags::AfterExec flag. Then this state is applied on
// the actual new program unveil data, and never on the m_exec_unveil_data.
VERIFY(data.state != VeilState::LockedInherited);
TRY(update_unveil_data(data, new_unveiled_path->view(), static_cast<UnveilAccess>(new_permissions)));
return {};
}));
}
return 0;
}
}
|
