| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We now position inline-level boxes based on ascent and descent metrics
from the font in use. This makes our basic text layouts look a lot more
like those produced by other browsers. :^)
I've tried to match the terminology used by the CSS Inline Layout spec.
This will regress Acid2 a little bit, and probably various other sites,
but on the whole it's the direction we should be heading, so let's go.
|
|
|
|
This avoids a bunch of unnecessary work in Painter which not only took
time, but sometimes also led to alignment issues. draw_text_run() will
draw the text where we tell it, and that's it.
|
|
By using enclosing_int_rect(), borders and backgrounds of boxes were
sometimes 1 pixel off, making things slightly larger than they should
be. Fix this by using to_rounded() instead of enclosing_int_rect().
There's definitely more of these type of issues lurking in the code,
and we'll get to them in time.
|
|
Relatively positioned boxes should not affect the *layout* of their
siblings. So instead of applying relative inset as a layout-time
translation on the box, we now perform the adjustment at the paintable
level instead.
This makes position:relative actually work as expected, and exposes some
new bugs we need to take care of for Acid2. :^)
|
|
This gives us consistent results with both bitmap and scalable fonts.
|
|
Now it actually looks like a classic focus outline and not some
misplaced border :^)
|
|
Instead of using the absolute_rect(), use absolute_border_box_rect() -
at least for PaintableBox - and inflate it by 2px on each side.
This looks much nicer for text input elements, especially when they have
padding, which would be applied outside the focus rect previously.
|
|
Normally, paintable coordinates are relative to the nearest containing
block, but in the SVG case, since <svg> doesn't form a containing block,
we have to specialize the computation of SVGPaintable::absolute_rect().
|
|
We don't yet take the spread-distance parameter into account, since we
don't have a way to "inflate" the text shadow.
Also, I'm not sure if we need to inflate the shadow slightly anyway.
Blurred shadows of our pixel fonts seem very faint. Part of this is
that a blur of < 3px does nothing, see #13231, but even so we might
want to inflate it a little.
|
|
The `text-shadow` property is almost identical to `box-shadow`:
> Values are interpreted as for box-shadow [CSS-BACKGROUNDS-3].
> (But note that the inset keyword are not allowed.)
So, let's use the same data structures and parsing code for both. :^)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We already walk the entire paint tree within each stacking context in
the main hit testing function (StackingContext::hit_test()), so there's
no need for each individual paintable to walk its own children again.
By not doing that, we remove a source of O(n^2) traversal which made hit
testing on deeply nested web pages unbearably slow.
|
|
Using "HitTestResult with null paintable" as a way to signal misses was
unnecessarily confusing. Let's use Optional instead. :^)
|
|
There's no actual need to build the stacking context tree before
performing layout. Instead, make it lazy and build the tree when it's
actually needed for something.
This avoids a bunch of work in situations where multiple synchronous
layouts are forced (typically by JavaScript) without painting or hit
testing taking place in between.
It also opens up for style invalidations that only target the stacking
context tree.
|
|
Since paintables have a default content size of 0x0, we were neglecting
to notify the corresponding layout node about size changes, if the used
content size came out to 0x0.
This fixes an issue where resizing an iframe to 0x0 didn't take effect.
|
|
This now also takes a FloatPoint instead of an IntPoint to avoid
excessive rounding when multiple transforms apply on top of each other.
|
|
No need to call the expensive establishes_stacking_context() here, as
we've already built the stacking context tree and can simply test for
the presence of existing stacking contexts.
|
|
All the other painting code has moved to paintables already.
|
|
The absolute rect of a paintable is somewhat expensive to compute. This
is because all coordinates are relative to the nearest containing block,
so we have to traverse the containing block chain and apply each offset
to get the final rect.
Paintables will never move between containing blocks, nor will their
absolute rect change. If anything changes, we'll simpl make a new
paintable and replace the old one.
Take advantage of this by caching the containing block and absolute rect
after first access.
|
|
|
|
|
