| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We need both a GlobalObject and Realm now, but can get the former from
the latter (once initialized).
This also fixes JS execution in LibWeb, as we failed to set the Realm of
the newly created Interpreter in this function.
|
|
This includes making FunctionObject::realm() actually return a Realm,
instead of a GlobalObject.
|
|
This is where the spec wants to have it. Requires a couple of hacks as
currently everything that needs a Realm actually has a GlobalObject, so
we need to go via the Interpreter.
|
|
Also pass a Realm reference to the Bytecode::Interpreter constructor,
just like we pass the GlobalObject.
|
|
The test262 tests under RegExp/property-escapes/generated will invoke
Reflect.apply with up to 10,000 arguments at a time. In LibJS, when the
call stack reached VM::call_internal, we transfer those arguments from
a MarkedValueList to the execution context's arguments Vector.
Because these types differ (MarkedValueList is a Vector<Value, 32>), the
arguments are copied rather than moved. By changing the arguments vector
to a MarkedValueList, we can properly move the passed arguments over.
This shaves about 2 seconds off the following test262 test (from 15sec):
RegExp/property-escapes/generated/General_Category_-_Decimal_Number.js
|
|
|
|
This removes all usages of the non-standard put helper method and
replaces all of it's usages with the specification required alternative
or with define_direct_property where appropriate.
|
|
The parser now keeps track of a scope chain so that it can hoist
function declarations to the closest function scope.
|
|
"Records" in the spec are basically C++ classes, so let's drop this
mouthful of a suffix.
|
|
These are basically what the spec calls "ordinary function objects",
so let's have the name reflect that. :^)
|
|
Instead of doing a VERIFY(is<T>(x)) and *then* casting it to T, we can
just do the cast right away with verify_cast<T>. :^)
|
|
This struct represents what the ECMAScript specification calls an
"execution context" so let's use the same terminology. :^)
|
|
These represent the outermost scope in the environment record
hierarchy. The spec says they should be a "composite" of two things:
- An ObjectEnvironmentRecord wrapping the global object
- A DeclarativeEnvironmentRecord for other declarations
It's not yet clear to me how this should work, so this patch only
implements the first part, an object record wrapping the global object.
|
|
To better follow the spec, we need to distinguish between the current
execution context's lexical environment and variable environment.
This patch moves us to having two record pointers, although both of
them point at the same environment records for now.
|
|
This patch adds FunctionEnvironmentRecord as a subclass of the existing
DeclarativeEnvironmentRecord. Things that are specific to function
environment records move into there, simplifying the base.
Most of the abstract operations related to function environment records
are rewritten to match the spec exactly. I also had to implement
GetThisEnvironment() and GetSuperConstructor() to keep tests working
after the changes, so that's nice as well. :^)
|
|
And rename some related functions that wrapped this as well.
|
|
This patch makes the following renames:
- get_from_scope() => get_from_environment_record()
- put_to_scope() => put_into_environment_record()
- delete_from_scope() => delete_from_environment_record()
|
|
This name matches the spec (corresponds to the [[OuterEnv]] slot.)
|
|
This patch makes the following name changes:
- ScopeObject => EnvironmentRecord
- LexicalEnvironment => DeclarativeEnvironmentRecord
- WithScope => ObjectEnvironmentRecord
|
|
|
|
As well as the needed functionality in VM to enqueue and run cleanup
jobs for the FinalizationRegistry instances.
|
|
This counter is increased each time a synchronous execution sequence
completes, and will allow us to emulate the abstract operations
AddToKeptObjects & ClearKeptObjects efficiently.
|
|
This avoid confusion in the order of the multiple boolean parameters
that exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"let" and "const" go in the lexical environment.
This fixes one part of #4001 (Lexically declared variables are mixed up
with global object properties)
|
|
Co-authored-by: Linus Groh <mail@linusgroh.de>
|
|
|
|
When using VM::set_variable() to put the created ScriptFunction onto a
ScopeObject, we would previously unexpectedly reach the global object as
set_variable() checks each traversed scope for an existing Variable with
the given name - which would cause a leak of the inner function past the
outer function (we even had a test expecting that behaviour!). Now we
first declare functions (as DeclarationKind::Var) before setting them.
This will need some more work to make hoisting across non-lexical scopes
work, but it fixes this specific issue for now.
Fixes #6766.
|
|
Instead of having to run queued promise jobs in LibWeb in various
places, this allows us to consolidate that into one function - this is
very close to how the spec describes it as well ("at some future point
in time, when there is no running execution context and the execution
context stack is empty, the implementation must [...]").
Eventually this will also be used to log unhandled exceptions, and
possibly other actions that require JS execution to have ended.
|
|
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
|
|
Same thing, but a lot more clear.
|
|
Almost a year after first working on this, it's finally done: an
implementation of Promises for LibJS! :^)
The core functionality is working and closely following the spec [1].
I mostly took the pseudo code and transformed it into C++ - if you read
and understand it, you will know how the spec implements Promises; and
if you read the spec first, the code will look very familiar.
Implemented functions are:
- Promise() constructor
- Promise.prototype.then()
- Promise.prototype.catch()
- Promise.prototype.finally()
- Promise.resolve()
- Promise.reject()
For the tests I added a new function to test-js's global object,
runQueuedPromiseJobs(), which calls vm.run_queued_promise_jobs().
By design, queued jobs normally only run after the script was fully
executed, making it improssible to test handlers in individual test()
calls by default [2].
Subsequent commits include integrations into LibWeb and js(1) -
pretty-printing, running queued promise jobs when necessary.
This has an unusual amount of dbgln() statements, all hidden behind the
PROMISE_DEBUG flag - I'm leaving them in for now as they've been very
useful while debugging this, things can get quite complex with so many
asynchronously executed functions.
I've not extensively explored use of these APIs for promise-based
functionality in LibWeb (fetch(), Notification.requestPermission()
etc.), but we'll get there in due time.
[1]: https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-promise-objects
[2]: https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-jobs-and-job-queues
|
|
Instead just link together the InterpreterNodeScopes in a linked list.
This was surprisingly hot on CanvasCycle.
|
|
|
|
For various statements the spec states:
Return NormalCompletion(empty).
In those cases we have been returning undefined so far, which is
incorrect.
In other cases it states:
Return Completion(UpdateEmpty(stmtCompletion, undefined)).
Which essentially means a statement is evaluated and its completion
value returned if non-empty, and undefined otherwise.
While not actually noticeable in normal scripts as the VM's "last value"
can't be accessed from JS code directly (with the exception of eval(),
see below), it provided an inconsistent experience in the REPL:
> if (true) 42;
42
> if (true) { 42; }
undefined
This also fixes the case where eval() would return undefined if the last
executed statement is not a value-producing one:
eval("1;;;;;")
eval("1;{}")
eval("1;var a;")
As a consequence of the changes outlined above, these now all correctly
return 1.
See https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-block-runtime-semantics-evaluation,
"NOTE 2".
Fixes #3609.
|
|
With one small exception, this is how we've been using this API already,
and it makes sense: a Program is just a ScopeNode with any number of
statements, which are executed one by one. There's no explicit return
value at the end, only a completion value of the last value-producing
statement, which we then access using VM::last_value() if needed (e.g.
in the REPL).
|
|
|
|
(...and ASSERT_NOT_REACHED => VERIFY_NOT_REACHED)
Since all of these checks are done in release builds as well,
let's rename them to VERIFY to prevent confusion, as everyone is
used to assertions being compiled out in release.
We can introduce a new ASSERT macro that is specifically for debug
checks, but I'm doing this wholesale conversion first since we've
accumulated thousands of these already, and it's not immediately
obvious which ones are suitable for ASSERT.
|
|
|
|
|
