diff options
author | Nicholas Baron <nicholas.baron.ten@gmail.com> | 2021-05-16 02:36:52 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2021-05-16 10:36:52 +0100 |
commit | aa4d41fe2c473c3bb78327a1dbe8ec85530259ca (patch) | |
tree | 925d408b37ab1f7750a3af37adfb2949fcafa836 /Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp | |
parent | bbaa4630323c20e37e2a0ead478987cb5f02fc53 (diff) | |
download | serenity-aa4d41fe2c473c3bb78327a1dbe8ec85530259ca.zip |
AK+Kernel+LibELF: Remove the need for `IteratorDecision::Continue`
By constraining two implementations, the compiler will select the best
fitting one. All this will require is duplicating the implementation and
simplifying for the `void` case.
This constraining also informs both the caller and compiler by passing
the callback parameter types as part of the constraint
(e.g.: `IterationFunction<int>`).
Some `for_each` functions in LibELF only take functions which return
`void`. This is a minimal correctness check, as it removes one way for a
function to incompletely do something.
There seems to be a possible idiom where inside a lambda, a `return;` is
the same as `continue;` in a for-loop.
Diffstat (limited to 'Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp b/Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp index 37281ad971..43d2d0cb6b 100644 --- a/Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp +++ b/Userland/Libraries/LibELF/DynamicLinker.cpp @@ -125,9 +125,8 @@ static Vector<String> get_dependencies(const String& name) lib->for_each_needed_library([&dependencies, &name](auto needed_name) { if (name == needed_name) - return IterationDecision::Continue; + return; dependencies.append(needed_name); - return IterationDecision::Continue; }); return dependencies; } |