| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Test persistent bitmap copying with and without removal of original
bitmap.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190708220502.12977-4-jsnow@redhat.com
[Edited comment "bitmap1" --> "bitmap2" as per review. --js]
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
|
|
Test fails at least for qcow, because of different cluster sizes in
base and top (and therefore different granularities of bitmaps we are
trying to merge).
The test aim is to check block-dirty-bitmap-merge between different
nodes functionality, no needs to check all formats. So, let's just drop
support for anything except qcow2.
Reported-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-id: 20190605155405.104384-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
|
|
This test shows that external snapshots and incremental backups are
friends.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190517152111.206494-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
|
