qemu - QEMU is a generic and open source machine & userspace emulator and virtualizer.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2020-05-15	qom: Drop parameter @errp of object_property_add() & friends	Markus Armbruster
	The only way object_property_add() can fail is when a property with the same name already exists. Since our property names are all hardcoded, failure is a programming error, and the appropriate way to handle it is passing &error_abort. Same for its variants, except for object_property_add_child(), which additionally fails when the child already has a parent. Parentage is also under program control, so this is a programming error, too. We have a bit over 500 callers. Almost half of them pass &error_abort, slightly fewer ignore errors, one test case handles errors, and the remaining few callers pass them to their own callers. The previous few commits demonstrated once again that ignoring programming errors is a bad idea. Of the few ones that pass on errors, several violate the Error API. The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second call. ich9_pm_add_properties(), sparc32_ledma_realize(), sparc32_dma_realize(), xilinx_axidma_realize(), xilinx_enet_realize() are wrong that way. When the one appropriate choice of argument is &error_abort, letting users pick the argument is a bad idea. Drop parameter @errp and assert the preconditions instead. There's one exception to "duplicate property name is a programming error": the way object_property_add() implements the magic (and undocumented) "automatic arrayification". Don't drop @errp there. Instead, rename object_property_add() to object_property_try_add(), and add the obvious wrapper object_property_add(). Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200505152926.18877-15-armbru@redhat.com> [Two semantic rebase conflicts resolved]
2020-01-24	qdev: set properties with device_class_set_props()	Marc-André Lureau
	The following patch will need to handle properties registration during class_init time. Let's use a device_class_set_props() setter. spatch --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h --sp-file ./scripts/coccinelle/qdev-set-props.cocci --keep-comments --in-place --dir . @@ typedef DeviceClass; DeviceClass *d; expression val; @@ - d->props = val + device_class_set_props(d, val) Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20200110153039.1379601-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-08-16	Include hw/qdev-properties.h less	Markus Armbruster
	In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/qdev-properties.h triggers a recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h). Many places including hw/qdev-properties.h (directly or via hw/qdev.h) actually need only hw/qdev-core.h. Include hw/qdev-core.h there instead. hw/qdev.h is actually pointless: all it does is include hw/qdev-core.h and hw/qdev-properties.h, which in turn includes hw/qdev-core.h. Replace the remaining uses of hw/qdev.h by hw/qdev-properties.h. While there, delete a few superfluous inclusions of hw/qdev-core.h. Touching hw/qdev-properties.h now recompiles some 1200 objects. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-22-armbru@redhat.com>
2019-06-12	Include qemu/module.h where needed, drop it from qemu-common.h	Markus Armbruster
	Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523143508.25387-4-armbru@redhat.com> [Rebased with conflicts resolved automatically, except for hw/usb/dev-hub.c hw/misc/exynos4210_rng.c hw/misc/bcm2835_rng.c hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c hw/display/virtio-vga.c hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c; ui/cocoa.m fixed up]
2018-08-28	hw/s390x: Move virtio-ccw-blk code to a separate file	Thomas Huth
	The code should only be enabled if CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK has been set. This can be done best if the code resides in a separate file. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <1532542110-9017-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>