| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The following patch will need to handle properties registration during
class_init time. Let's use a device_class_set_props() setter.
spatch --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h --sp-file
./scripts/coccinelle/qdev-set-props.cocci --keep-comments --in-place
--dir .
@@
typedef DeviceClass;
DeviceClass *d;
expression val;
@@
- d->props = val
+ device_class_set_props(d, val)
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200110153039.1379601-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
In my "build everything" tree, changing migration/vmstate.h triggers a
recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and
objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers
include it just to get VMStateDescription. The previous commit made
that unnecessary.
Include migration/vmstate.h only where it's still needed. Touching it
now recompiles only some 1600 objects.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-16-armbru@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/irq.h triggers a recompile
of some 5400 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that
don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers
include it just to get qemu_irq and.or qemu_irq_handler.
Move the qemu_irq and qemu_irq_handler typedefs from hw/irq.h to
qemu/typedefs.h, and then include hw/irq.h only where it's still
needed. Touching it now recompiles only some 500 objects.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-13-armbru@redhat.com>
|
|
The SSE-200 hardware has configurable integration settings which
determine whether its two CPUs have the FPU and DSP:
* CPU0_FPU (default 0)
* CPU0_DSP (default 0)
* CPU1_FPU (default 1)
* CPU1_DSP (default 1)
Similarly, the IoTKit has settings for its single CPU:
* CPU0_FPU (default 1)
* CPU0_DSP (default 1)
Of our four boards that use either the IoTKit or the SSE-200:
* mps2-an505, mps2-an521 and musca-a use the default settings
* musca-b1 enables FPU and DSP on both CPUs
Currently QEMU models all these boards using CPUs with
both FPU and DSP enabled. This means that we are incorrect
for mps2-an521 and musca-a, which should not have FPU or DSP
on CPU0.
Create QOM properties on the ARMSSE devices corresponding to the
default h/w integration settings, and make the Musca-B1 board
enable FPU and DSP on both CPUs. This fixes the mps2-an521
and musca-a behaviour, and leaves the musca-b1 and mps2-an505
behaviour unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190517174046.11146-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523143508.25387-4-armbru@redhat.com>
[Rebased with conflicts resolved automatically, except for
hw/usb/dev-hub.c hw/misc/exynos4210_rng.c hw/misc/bcm2835_rng.c
hw/misc/aspeed_scu.c hw/display/virtio-vga.c hw/arm/stm32f205_soc.c;
ui/cocoa.m fixed up]
|
|
The header file hw/arm/arm.h now includes only declarations
relating to hw/arm/boot.c functionality. Rename it accordingly,
and adjust its header comment.
The bulk of this commit was created via
perl -pi -e 's|hw/arm/arm.h|hw/arm/boot.h|' hw/arm/*.c include/hw/arm/*.h
In a few cases we can just delete the #include:
hw/arm/msf2-soc.c, include/hw/arm/aspeed_soc.h and
include/hw/arm/bcm2836.h did not require it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190516163857.6430-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
At the moment the handling of init-svtor and cpuwait initial
values is split between armsse.c and iotkit-sysctl.c:
the code in armsse.c sets the initial state of the CPU
object by setting the init-svtor and start-powered-off
properties, but the iotkit-sysctl.c code has its own
code setting the reset values of its registers (which are
then used when updating the CPU when the guest makes
runtime changes).
Clean this up by making the armsse.c code set properties on the
iotkit-sysctl object to define the initial values of the
registers, so they always match the initial CPU state,
and update the comments in armsse.c accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SYSCTL block in the SSE-200 has some extra registers that
are not present in the IoTKit version. Add these registers
(as reads-as-written stubs), enabled by a new QOM property.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Create and connect the MHUs in the SSE-200.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The region 0x40010000 .. 0x4001ffff and its secure-only alias
at 0x50010000... are for per-CPU devices. We implement this by
giving each CPU its own container memory region, where the
per-CPU devices live. Unfortunately, the alias region which
makes devices mapped at 0x4... addresses also appear at 0x5...
is only implemented in the overall "all CPUs" container. The
effect of this bug is that the CPU_IDENTITY register block appears
only at 0x4001f000, but not at the 0x5001f000 alias where it should
also appear. Guests (like very recent Arm Trusted Firmware-M)
which try to access it at 0x5001f000 will crash.
Fix this by moving the handling for this alias from the "all CPUs"
container to the per-CPU container. (We leave the aliases for
0x1... and 0x3... in the overall container, because there are
no per-CPU devices there.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190215180500.6906-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
|
|
The Musca boards have DAPLink firmware that sets the initial
secure VTOR value (the location of the vector table) differently
depending on the boot mode (from flash, from RAM, etc). Export
the init-svtor as a QOM property of the ARMSSE object so that
the board can change it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
|
|
Coverity points out (CID 1398632, CID 1398650) that we
leak a couple of allocated strings in the error-exit
code path for setting up the MHUs in the ARMSSE.
Fix this bug by moving the allocate-and-free of each
string to be closer to the use, so we do the free before
doing the error-exit check.
Fixes: f8574705f62b38a ("hw/arm/armsse: Add unimplemented-device stubs for MHUs")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190215113707.24553-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
In commit 91c1e9fcbd7548db368 where we added dual-CPU support to
the ARMSSE, we set up the wiring of the expansion IRQs via nested
loops: the outer loop on 'i' loops for each CPU, and the inner loop
on 'j' loops for each interrupt. Fix a typo which meant we were
wiring every expansion IRQ line to external IRQ 0 on CPU 0 and
to external IRQ 1 on CPU 1.
Fixes: 91c1e9fcbd7548db368 ("hw/arm/armsse: Support dual-CPU configuration")
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
Add a model of the SSE-200, now we have put in all
the code that lets us make it different from the IoTKit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-22-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Instantiate a copy of the CPU_IDENTITY register block for each CPU
in an SSE-200.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-21-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SSE-200 has a "CPU local security control" register bank; add an
unimplemented-device stub for it. (The register bank has only one
interesting register, which allows the guest to lock down changes
to various CPU registers so they cannot be modified further. We
don't support that in our Cortex-M33 model anyway.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SSE-200 gives each CPU a register bank to use to control its
L1 instruction cache. Put in an unimplemented-device stub for this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Add unimplemented-device stubs for the various Power Policy Unit
devices that the SSE-200 has.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SSE-200 has two Message Handling Units (MHUs), which sit behind
the APB PPC0. Wire up some unimplemented-device stubs for these,
since we don't yet implement a real model of this device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SYS_VERSION and SYS_CONFIG register values differ between the
IoTKit and SSE-200. Make them configurable via QOM properties rather
than hard-coded, and set them appropriately in the ARMSSE code that
instantiates the IOTKIT_SYSINFO device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Create a cluster object to hold each CPU in the SSE. They are
logically distinct and may be configured differently (for instance
one may not have an FPU where the other does).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Give each CPU its own container memory region. This is necessary
for two reasons:
* some devices are instantiated one per CPU and the CPU sees only
its own device
* since a memory region can only be put into one container, we must
give each armv7m object a different MemoryRegion as its 'memory'
property, or a dual-CPU configuration will assert on realize when
the second armv7m object tries to put the MR into a container when
it is already in the first armv7m object's container
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SSE-200 has two Cortex-M33 CPUs. These see the same view
of memory, with the exception of the "private CPU region" which
has per-CPU devices. Internal device interrupts for SSE-200
devices are mostly wired up to both CPUs, with the exception of
a few per-CPU devices. External GPIO inputs on the SSE-200
device are provided for the second CPU's interrupts above 32,
as is already the case for the first CPU.
Refactor the code to support creation of multiple CPUs.
For the moment we leave all CPUs with the same view of
memory: this will not work in the multiple-CPU case, but
we will fix this in the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
For the IoTKit the SRAM bank size is always 32K (15 bits); for the
SSE-200 this is a configurable parameter, which defaults to 32K but
can be changed when it is built into a particular SoC. For instance
the Musca-B1 board sets it to 128K (17 bits).
Make the bank size a QOM property. We follow the SSE-200 hardware in
naming the parameter SRAM_ADDR_WIDTH, which specifies the number of
address bits of a single SRAM bank.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SSE-200 has four banks of SRAM, each with its own
Memory Protection Controller, where the IoTKit has only one.
Make the number of SRAM banks a field in ARMSSEInfo.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
The SSE-200 has 4 banks of SRAM, each with its own internal
Memory Protection Controller. The interrupt status for these
extra MPCs appears in the same security controller SECMPCINTSTATUS
register as the MPC for the IoTKit's single SRAM bank. Enhance the
iotkit-secctl device to allow 4 MPCs. (If the particular IoTKit/SSE
variant in use does not have all 4 MPCs then the unused inputs will
simply result in the SECMPCINTSTATUS bits being zero as required.)
The hardcoded constant "1"s in armsse.c indicate the actual number
of SRAM MPCs the IoTKit has, and will be replaced in the following
commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
|
Rename the files that used to be iotkit.[ch] to
armsse.[ch] to reflect the fact they new cover
multiple Arm subsystems for embedded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
|
