| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #81.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Squashed commit of the async branch.
|
|
|
|
This is a somewhat involved change with two breaking API changes:
1) Lua::coerce_xxx methods now return Option (this is easier and faster than
dealing with Result)
2) rlua numeric conversions now allow more loss of precision
conversions (e.g. 1.5f32 to 1i32)
The logic for the first breaking change is that mostly the coerce methods are
probably used internally, and they make sense as low-level fallible casts and
are now used as such, and there's no reason to confuse things with a Result with
a large error type and force the user to match on the error which will hopefully
only be FromLuaConversionError anyway.
The logic for the second change is that it matches the behavior of
num_traits::cast, and is more consistent in that *some* loss of precision
conversions were previously allowed (e.g. f64 to f32).
The problem is that now, Lua::coerce_integer and Lua::unpack::<i64> have
different behavior when given, for example, the number 1.5. I still think this
is the best option, though, because the Lua::coerce_xxx methods represent how
Lua works internally and the standard C API cast functions that Lua provides,
and the ToLua / FromLua code represents the most common form of fallible Rust
numeric conversion.
I could revert this change and turn `Lua::eval::<i64>("1.5", None)` back into an
error, but it seems inconsistent to allow f64 -> f32 loss of precision but not
f64 -> i64 loss of precision.
|
|
|
|
Uses the same UserData trait, and should at least in theory support everything
that 'static UserData does, except that any functions added that rely on
AnyUserData are pretty much useless.
Probably pretty slow and I'm not sure how to make it dramatically faster, which
is a shame because generally when you need non'-static userdata you might be
creating it kind of a lot (if it was long-lived, it would probably be 'static).
Haven't added tests yet, will do that next.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, so this is kind of a mega-commit of a lot of performance related changes
to rlua, some of which are pretty complicated.
There are some small improvements here and there, but most of the benefits of
this change are from a few big changes. The simplest big change is that there
is now `protect_lua` as well as `protect_lua_call`, which allows skipping a
lightuserdata parameter and some stack manipulation in some cases. Second
simplest is the change to use Vec instead of VecDeque for MultiValue, and to
have MultiValue be used as a sort of "backwards-only" Vec so that ToLuaMulti /
FromLuaMulti still work correctly.
The most complex change, though, is a change to the way LuaRef works, so that
LuaRef can optionally point into the Lua stack instead of only registry values.
At state creation a set number of stack slots is reserved for the first N LuaRef
types (currently 16), and space for these are also allocated separately
allocated at callback time. There is a huge breaking change here, which is that
now any LuaRef types MUST only be used with the Lua on which they were created,
and CANNOT be used with any other Lua callback instance. This mostly will
affect people using LuaRef types from inside a scope callback, but hopefully in
those cases `Function::bind` will be a suitable replacement. On the plus side,
the rules for LuaRef types are easier to state now.
There is probably more easy-ish perf on the table here, but here's the
preliminary results, based on my very limited benchmarks:
create table time: [314.13 ns 315.71 ns 317.44 ns]
change: [-36.154% -35.670% -35.205%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
create array 10 time: [2.9731 us 2.9816 us 2.9901 us]
change: [-16.996% -16.600% -16.196%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
create string table 10 time: [5.6904 us 5.7164 us 5.7411 us]
change: [-53.536% -53.309% -53.079%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
call add function 3 10 time: [5.1134 us 5.1222 us 5.1320 us]
change: [-4.1095% -3.6910% -3.1781%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
call callback add 2 10 time: [5.4408 us 5.4480 us 5.4560 us]
change: [-6.4203% -5.7780% -5.0013%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
call callback append 10 time: [9.8243 us 9.8410 us 9.8586 us]
change: [-26.937% -26.702% -26.469%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
create registry 10 time: [3.7005 us 3.7089 us 3.7174 us]
change: [-8.4965% -8.1042% -7.6926%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
I think that a lot of these benchmarks are too "easy", and most API usage is
going to be more like the 'create string table 10' benchmark, where there are a
lot of handles and tables and strings, so I think that 25%-50% improvement is a
good guess for most use cases.
|
|
The expected change is always zero, because stack_guard / stack_err_guard are
always used at `rlua` entry / exit points.
|
|
* Make Lua Send
* Add Send bounds to (nearly) all instances where userdata and functions are
passed to Lua
* Add a "scope" method which takes a callback that accepts a `Scope`, and give
`Scope` the ability to create functions and userdata that are !Send, *and also
functions that are not even 'static!*.
|
|
Also fixes a safety issue with RegistryKey, where you could use RegistryKeys
with mismatching Lua instances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was only allowed for `UserData` implementors that are also `Copy`.
This relaxes the requirement to be `Clone` instead.
While `Copy` makes sense to prevent allocations and other potentially
costly operations, other `FromLua` impls already do pretty expensive
stuff, so this seems worth it.
|
|
Rename the following:
LuaNil => Nil
LuaExternalError => ExternalError
LuaExternalResult => ExternalResult
LuaCallback => Callback (internal only)
Use qualified re-exports at the top of the module.
Add a new public 'prelude' module which re-exports everything with a
non-conflicting name (Adds back the Lua prefix), and is meant to be imported
unqualified.
|
|
This required a lot of little adjustments where we used std's `String`
before. In downstream code, this shouldn't be necessary, as you can just
do `use rlua::String as LuaString` to disambiguate.
|
|
cc #15
Doesn't touch `LuaString` mainly because that's a *lot* of renaming work
and the code looks weird. Also I want feedback before I proceed.
|
|
I know, this is the opposite of PR #17 wishes to do, please don't take this as
an indication that I would wish to do the opposite. I actually want to discuss
PR #17 with you, but I'm not sure about it yet, and my pedantry will not allow
me to let this remain inconsistent in the meantime. This way, either way it's
consistent haha.
|
|
It, ahem "should not" be possible to exhaust lua stack space in normal usage,
and causing stack errors to be Err is slightly obnoxious. I have been wanting
to make this change for a while, and removing the callback API from tables makes
this sensible *I think*.
I can think of a couple of ways that this is not technically true, but I think
that they are acceptable, or should be handled differently.
One, you can make arbitrarily sized LuaVariadic values. I think this is maybe a
bug already, because there is an argument limit in Lua which is lower than the
stack limit. I'm not sure what happens there, but if it is a stack based panic,
(or any panic?) it is a bug.
Two, I believe that if you recurse over and over between lua -> rust -> lua ->
rust etc, and call rlua API functions, you might get a stack panic. I think for
trusted lua code, this is morally equivalent to a regular stack overflow in
plain rust, which is already.. well it's not a panic but it's some kind of safe
crash I'm not sure, so I think this is acceptable. For *untrusted* lua code,
this could theoretically be a problem if the API provided a callback that would
call back into lua, then some lua script could force a stack based panic. There
are so many concerns with untrusted lua code, and this library is NOT safe
enough yet for untrusted code (it doesn't even provide an option to limit lua to
the safe API subset yet!), so this is not currently an issue. When the library
provides support for "safe lua", it should come with big warnings anyway, and
being able to force a stack panic is pretty minor in comparison.
I think if there are other ways to cause unbounded stack usage, that it is a
bug, or there can be an error just for that situation, like argument count
limits.
This commit also fixes several stupid bugs with tests, stack checking, and
panics.
|
|
The multi-level error types were a mistake. Probably should have waited on the
cargo version bump, oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible that I have gone too far here into error discrimination and
should scale it back, not sure yet.
|
|
The current situation with error_chain is less than ideal, and there are lots of
conflicting interests that are impossible to meet at once. Here is an
unorganized brain dump of the current situation, stay awhile and listen!
This change was triggered ultimately by the desire to make LuaError implement
Clone, and this is currently impossible with error_chain. LuaError must
implement Clone to be a proper lua citizen that can live as userdata within a
lua runtime, because there is no way to limit what the lua runtime can do with a
received error. Currently, this is solved by there being a rule that the error
will "expire" if the error is passed back into rust, and this is very
sub-optimal. In fact, one could easily imagine a scenario where lua is for
example memoizing some function, and if the function has ever errored in the
past the function should continue returning the same error, and this situation
immediately fails with this restriciton in place.
Additionally, there are other more minor problems with error_chain which make
the API less good than it could be, or limit how we can use error_chain. This
change has already solved a small bug in a Chucklefish project, where the
conversion from an external error type (Borrow[Mut]Error) was allowed but not
intended for user code, and was accidentally used. Additionally, pattern
matching on error_chain errors, which should be common when dealing with Lua, is
less convenient than a hand rolled error type.
So, if we decide not to use error_chain, we now have a new set of problems if we
decide interoperability with error_chain is important. The first problem we run
into is that there are two natural bounds for wrapped errors that we would
pick, (Error + Send + Sync), or just Error, and neither of them will
interoperate well with error_chain. (Error + Send + Sync) means we can't wrap
error chain errors into LuaError::ExternalError (they're missing the Sync
bound), and having the bounds be just Error means the opposite, that we can't
hold a LuaError inside an error_chain error.
We could just decide that interoperability with error_chain is the most
important qualification, and pick (Error + Send), but this causes a DIFFERENT
set of problems. The rust ecosystem has the two primary error bounds as Error
or (Error + Send + Sync), and there are Into impls from &str / String to
Box<Error + Send + Sync> for example, but NOT (Error + Send). This means that
we are forced to manually recreate the conversions from &str / String to
LuaError rather than relying on a single Into<Box<Error + Send + Sync>> bound,
but this means that string conversions have a different set of methods than
other error types for external error conversion. I have not been able to figure
out an API that I am happy with that uses the (Error + Send) bound. Box<Error>
is obnoxious because not having errors implement Send causes needless problems
in a multithreaded context, so that leaves (Error + Send + Sync). This is
actually a completely reasonable bound for external errors, and has the nice
String Into impls that we would want, the ONLY problem is that it is a pain to
interoperate with the current version of error_chain.
It would be nice to be able to specify the traits that an error generated by the
error_chain macro would implement, and this is apparently in progress in the
error_chain library. This would solve both the problem with not being able to
implement Clone and the problems with (Error + Send) bounds. I am not convinced
that this library should go back to using error_chain when that functionality is
in stable error_chain though, because of the other minor usability problems with
using error_chain.
In that theoretical situation, the downside of NOT using error_chain is simply
that there would not be automatic stacktraces of LuaError. This is not a huge
problem, because stack traces of lua errors are not extremely useful, and for
external errors it is not too hard to create a different version of the
LuaExternalResult / LuaExternalError traits and do conversion from an
error_chain type into a type that will print the stacktrace on display, or
use downcasting in the error causes.
So in summary, this library is no longer using error_chain, and probably will
not use it again in the future. Currently this means that to interoperate with
error_chain, you should use error_chain 0.8.1, which derives Sync on errors, or
wait for a version that supports user defined trait derives. In the future
when error_chain supports user defined trait derives, users may have to take an
extra step to make wrapped external errors print the stacktrace that they
capture.
This change works, but is not entirely complete. There is no error
documentation yet, and the change brought to a head an ugly module organization
problem. There will be more commits for documentation and reorganization, then
a new stable version of rlua.
|
