summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt')
-rw-r--r--security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt101
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt b/security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d8e6850
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+Multiple vulnerabilities in Irssi [1]
+=====================================
+
+
+Description
+-----------
+
+Four vulnerabilities have been located in Irssi.
+
+(a) A NULL pointer dereference in the nickcmp function found by Joseph
+ Bisch. (CWE-690)
+
+(b) Use after free when receiving invalid nick message (Issue #466, CWE-146)
+
+(c) Out of bounds read in certain incomplete control codes found by
+ Joseph Bisch. (CWE-126)
+
+(d) Out of bounds read in certain incomplete character sequences found
+ by Hanno Böck and independently by J. Bisch. (CWE-126)
+
+
+Impact
+------
+
+These issues may result in denial of service (remote crash).
+
+
+Affected versions
+-----------------
+
+(a) All Irssi versions that we observed
+(b) All Irssi versions that we observed
+(c) Irssi 0.8.17 and later
+(d) Irssi 0.8.18 and later
+
+
+Fixed in
+--------
+
+Irssi 0.8.21, Irssi 1.0.0
+
+
+Recommended action
+------------------
+
+Upgrade to Irssi 0.8.21. Irssi 0.8.21 is a maintenance release
+without any new features.
+
+After installing the updated packages, one can issue the /upgrade
+command to load the new binary. TLS connections will require
+/reconnect.
+
+
+A Note to Distributors
+----------------------
+
+First of all, thanks to every maintainer for their awesome job in
+packaging Irssi and backporting security fixes.
+
+When we had to release a security advisory last year with Irssi
+0.8.20, we noticed there was a huge confusion amongst Ubuntu users
+about whether their Irssi version was safe to use.
+
+Since all our releases 0.8.18, 0.8.19, 0.8.20 and 0.8.21 have been bug
+fix only, we think distributions should just ship the release.
+
+But if the security fixes only are backported on top of an old
+version, we would like to urge distributions to consider indicating
+this in a way that is visible inside Irssi. One way to do this would
+be to manually overwrite the PACKAGE_VERSION and marking your package
+as patched. This can be done for example like this:
+
+ ./configure PACKAGE_VERSION=0.8.17-sa201701
+
+
+You can then check the version from inside Irssi with /eval echo $J
+
+As an added benefit over relying on dpkg, this will also correctly
+report whether you had /upgrade done or not. We are looking for a ways
+to make this easier to handle for both packagers and us, so if you
+have a good idea on this matter please speak forth.
+
+Mitigating facts
+----------------
+
+(a) requires control over the ircd
+
+(b), (d) require control over the ircd or otherwise can be triggered /
+ avoided by the user themselves
+
+
+Patch
+-----
+
+https://github.com/irssi/irssi/commit/6c6c42e3d1b49d90aacc0b67f8540471cae02a1d
+
+
+References
+----------
+
+[1] https://irssi.org/security/irssi_sa_2017_01.txt